Deepgram alternative: Avencera vs Deepgram
At 100 hours a month with speaker labels, Deepgram Nova-3 costs 3.6× as much as Avencera. Avencera’s speaker labels make fewer errors on all 10 recording types in pyannoteAI’s benchmark. Avencera transcribes words more accurately than Deepgram on the one published test that covers both.
At a glance
Deepgram is a speech-to-text API known for its Nova models and low-latency streaming. Nova-3 includes speaker labels on recorded audio, and a yearly Growth plan lowers the hourly rate in exchange for an upfront commitment.
| Feature | Avencera | Deepgram |
|---|---|---|
| Transcript, at 100 hours a month | $0.06 an hour | Nova-3: $0.258 an hour, Pay as you go plan (4.3×) |
| With speaker labels, at 100 hours a month | $0.07 an hour | Nova-3: $0.258 an hour, Pay as you go plan (3.6×) |
| Speaker labels | Included in the speaker transcript price | Nova-3: included |
| Billing | Prepaid credit, no subscription | Nova-3: Pay as you go, or Growth, billed yearly from $333.33 a month |
| Real-time streaming | No, recorded audio only | Yes |
| Languages | English with Parakeet v2, 25 European languages with v3 | 45+ languages for Nova models |
| Longest file | 2 hours or 100 MB per request, 24 hours as a job | 2 GB per file |
| Self-hosting | Open models you can run yourself | Self-hosted containers on Enterprise plans |
| API | OpenAI-compatible | Deepgram’s own |
Price with speaker labels
| Audio a month | Avencera | Deepgram Nova-3 |
|---|---|---|
| 10 hours | $0.70 | $2.58 3.6× |
| 100 hours | $7.00 | $25.80 3.6× |
| 1,000 hours | $70.00 | $258.00 3.6× |
| 10,000 hours | $700.00 | $2,160.00 3.0× |
See every provider at any volume on the pricing page.
Accuracy
Speaker labels
Avencera’s speaker labels make fewer errors than Deepgram Nova-3 on all 10 recording types in pyannoteAI’s benchmark. Averaged across them, the diarization error rate is 23.5% for Avencera and 46.1% for Nova-3.
- Radio interviews 12 recordings, 3 or 4 speakers
Avencera by 16.4 points
Avencera community-1: 10.4%. Deepgram Nova-3: 26.8%.
- Clinical interviews 51 recordings, 2 or 3 speakers
Avencera by 21.2 points
Avencera community-1: 23.5%. Deepgram Nova-3: 44.7%.
- Courtroom 12 recordings, 3 to 9 speakers
Avencera by 14.2 points
Avencera community-1: 11.6%. Deepgram Nova-3: 25.8%.
- Phone calls 61 recordings, 2 speakers
Avencera by 20.6 points
Avencera community-1: 12.2%. Deepgram Nova-3: 32.8%.
- Task dialogues 19 recordings, 2 speakers
Avencera by 35.8 points
Avencera community-1: 10.1%. Deepgram Nova-3: 45.9%.
- Meetings 11 recordings, 3 to 6 speakers
Avencera by 23.4 points
Avencera community-1: 36.4%. Deepgram Nova-3: 59.8%.
- Restaurant conversations 12 recordings, 4 to 8 speakers
Avencera by 24.2 points
Avencera community-1: 51.0%. Deepgram Nova-3: 75.2%.
- Field interviews 22 recordings, 2 or 3 speakers
Avencera by 17.2 points
Avencera community-1: 18.2%. Deepgram Nova-3: 35.4%.
- Lab interviews 12 recordings, 2 speakers
Avencera by 17.9 points
Avencera community-1: 14.1%. Deepgram Nova-3: 32.0%.
- Web video 35 recordings, 1 to 7 speakers
Avencera by 35.1 points
Avencera community-1: 47.8%. Deepgram Nova-3: 82.9%.
Words
Avencera transcribes words more accurately than Deepgram on the one published test that covers both.
- Artificial Analysis Word error rate, measured on each provider’s own API
Avencera by 0.7 points
Avencera Parakeet v3: 4.5%. Deepgram Nova-3: 5.2%.
Which to choose
Choose Deepgram if
- You need real-time streaming. Deepgram offers it; Avencera transcribes recorded audio only.
- You need more languages. Deepgram lists 45+ languages for Nova models.
- You want to start free. New Deepgram accounts get $200 of free credit.
- You need an API today. Avencera opens soon.
Choose Avencera if
- You want the lower bill. Deepgram Nova-3 costs 3.6× as much at 100 hours a month with speaker labels.
- You want better speaker labels for less. In pyannoteAI’s benchmark, Avencera’s speaker labels make fewer errors than Nova-3 on all 10 recording types, 23.5% against 46.1% on average.
- You want word accuracy for less. Nova-3 scores 5.2% on the Artificial Analysis, against 4.5% for Parakeet v3.
- You want prepaid credit with no subscription, no minimum and no expiry.
- You don’t want a yearly commitment. Deepgram’s lower Growth rate needs one; Avencera’s rate is the same from the first hour.
- Your audio stays yours. Avencera deletes it once the transcript is ready and never trains on it.
Switching to Avencera
Avencera serves OpenAI’s transcription API, so the official OpenAI SDKs work with a new base
URL and model name. Set speaker_labels to true for a speaker on every
segment.
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.avencera.com/v1", api_key="YOUR_AVENCERA_KEY")
with open("meeting.mp3", "rb") as audio:
transcript = client.audio.transcriptions.create(
model="avencera/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2",
file=audio,
extra_body={"speaker_labels": True},
)Questions
- Is Avencera cheaper than Deepgram?
- Yes. Avencera transcribes from $0.06 an hour, or $0.07 with speaker labels. At 100 hours a month with speaker labels, Deepgram Nova-3 costs $25.80 against $7.00 at Avencera, 3.6× as much.
- Is Avencera more accurate than Deepgram?
- Avencera’s speaker labels make fewer errors than Deepgram Nova-3 on all 10 recording types in pyannoteAI’s benchmark. Averaged across them, the diarization error rate is 23.5% for Avencera and 46.1% for Nova-3. Avencera transcribes words more accurately than Deepgram on the one published test that covers both. Nova-3 scores 5.2% on the Artificial Analysis, against 4.5% for Parakeet v3.
- Does Deepgram charge extra for speaker labels?
- Not for recorded audio with Nova-3. Deepgram charges extra for speaker labels on streaming audio.
- How do I switch from Deepgram to Avencera?
- Avencera uses OpenAI’s transcription API format, so any OpenAI SDK works. Send the same audio files you send Deepgram, and map its response fields to the OpenAI-style transcript.