Deepgram alternative: Avencera vs Deepgram

At 100 hours a month with speaker labels, Deepgram Nova-3 costs 3.6× as much as Avencera. Avencera’s speaker labels make fewer errors on all 10 recording types in pyannoteAI’s benchmark. Avencera transcribes words more accurately than Deepgram on the one published test that covers both.

At a glance

Deepgram is a speech-to-text API known for its Nova models and low-latency streaming. Nova-3 includes speaker labels on recorded audio, and a yearly Growth plan lowers the hourly rate in exchange for an upfront commitment.

FeatureAvenceraDeepgram
Transcript, at 100 hours a month$0.06 an hourNova-3: $0.258 an hour, Pay as you go plan (4.3×)
With speaker labels, at 100 hours a month$0.07 an hourNova-3: $0.258 an hour, Pay as you go plan (3.6×)
Speaker labelsIncluded in the speaker transcript priceNova-3: included
BillingPrepaid credit, no subscriptionNova-3: Pay as you go, or Growth, billed yearly from $333.33 a month
Real-time streamingNo, recorded audio onlyYes
LanguagesEnglish with Parakeet v2, 25 European languages with v345+ languages for Nova models
Longest file2 hours or 100 MB per request, 24 hours as a job2 GB per file
Self-hostingOpen models you can run yourselfSelf-hosted containers on Enterprise plans
APIOpenAI-compatibleDeepgram’s own

Price with speaker labels

Audio a monthAvenceraDeepgram Nova-3
10 hours$0.70$2.58 3.6×
100 hours$7.00$25.80 3.6×
1,000 hours$70.00$258.00 3.6×
10,000 hours$700.00$2,160.00 3.0×

See every provider at any volume on the pricing page.

Accuracy

Speaker labels

Avencera’s speaker labels make fewer errors than Deepgram Nova-3 on all 10 recording types in pyannoteAI’s benchmark. Averaged across them, the diarization error rate is 23.5% for Avencera and 46.1% for Nova-3.

Diarization error rate by recording type, lower is better
  1. Radio interviews 12 recordings, 3 or 4 speakers

    Avencera by 16.4 points

    Avencera community-1: 10.4%. Deepgram Nova-3: 26.8%.

  2. Clinical interviews 51 recordings, 2 or 3 speakers

    Avencera by 21.2 points

    Avencera community-1: 23.5%. Deepgram Nova-3: 44.7%.

  3. Courtroom 12 recordings, 3 to 9 speakers

    Avencera by 14.2 points

    Avencera community-1: 11.6%. Deepgram Nova-3: 25.8%.

  4. Phone calls 61 recordings, 2 speakers

    Avencera by 20.6 points

    Avencera community-1: 12.2%. Deepgram Nova-3: 32.8%.

  5. Task dialogues 19 recordings, 2 speakers

    Avencera by 35.8 points

    Avencera community-1: 10.1%. Deepgram Nova-3: 45.9%.

  6. Meetings 11 recordings, 3 to 6 speakers

    Avencera by 23.4 points

    Avencera community-1: 36.4%. Deepgram Nova-3: 59.8%.

  7. Restaurant conversations 12 recordings, 4 to 8 speakers

    Avencera by 24.2 points

    Avencera community-1: 51.0%. Deepgram Nova-3: 75.2%.

  8. Field interviews 22 recordings, 2 or 3 speakers

    Avencera by 17.2 points

    Avencera community-1: 18.2%. Deepgram Nova-3: 35.4%.

  9. Lab interviews 12 recordings, 2 speakers

    Avencera by 17.9 points

    Avencera community-1: 14.1%. Deepgram Nova-3: 32.0%.

  10. Web video 35 recordings, 1 to 7 speakers

    Avencera by 35.1 points

    Avencera community-1: 47.8%. Deepgram Nova-3: 82.9%.

Words

Avencera transcribes words more accurately than Deepgram on the one published test that covers both.

Word error rate by benchmark, lower is better
  1. Artificial Analysis Word error rate, measured on each provider’s own API

    Avencera by 0.7 points

    Avencera Parakeet v3: 4.5%. Deepgram Nova-3: 5.2%.

Which to choose

Choose Deepgram if

  • You need real-time streaming. Deepgram offers it; Avencera transcribes recorded audio only.
  • You need more languages. Deepgram lists 45+ languages for Nova models.
  • You want to start free. New Deepgram accounts get $200 of free credit.
  • You need an API today. Avencera opens soon.

Choose Avencera if

  • You want the lower bill. Deepgram Nova-3 costs 3.6× as much at 100 hours a month with speaker labels.
  • You want better speaker labels for less. In pyannoteAI’s benchmark, Avencera’s speaker labels make fewer errors than Nova-3 on all 10 recording types, 23.5% against 46.1% on average.
  • You want word accuracy for less. Nova-3 scores 5.2% on the Artificial Analysis, against 4.5% for Parakeet v3.
  • You want prepaid credit with no subscription, no minimum and no expiry.
  • You don’t want a yearly commitment. Deepgram’s lower Growth rate needs one; Avencera’s rate is the same from the first hour.
  • Your audio stays yours. Avencera deletes it once the transcript is ready and never trains on it.

Switching to Avencera

Avencera serves OpenAI’s transcription API, so the official OpenAI SDKs work with a new base URL and model name. Set speaker_labels to true for a speaker on every segment.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.avencera.com/v1", api_key="YOUR_AVENCERA_KEY")

with open("meeting.mp3", "rb") as audio:
    transcript = client.audio.transcriptions.create(
        model="avencera/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2",
        file=audio,
        extra_body={"speaker_labels": True},
    )

Questions

Is Avencera cheaper than Deepgram?
Yes. Avencera transcribes from $0.06 an hour, or $0.07 with speaker labels. At 100 hours a month with speaker labels, Deepgram Nova-3 costs $25.80 against $7.00 at Avencera, 3.6× as much.
Is Avencera more accurate than Deepgram?
Avencera’s speaker labels make fewer errors than Deepgram Nova-3 on all 10 recording types in pyannoteAI’s benchmark. Averaged across them, the diarization error rate is 23.5% for Avencera and 46.1% for Nova-3. Avencera transcribes words more accurately than Deepgram on the one published test that covers both. Nova-3 scores 5.2% on the Artificial Analysis, against 4.5% for Parakeet v3.
Does Deepgram charge extra for speaker labels?
Not for recorded audio with Nova-3. Deepgram charges extra for speaker labels on streaming audio.
How do I switch from Deepgram to Avencera?
Avencera uses OpenAI’s transcription API format, so any OpenAI SDK works. Send the same audio files you send Deepgram, and map its response fields to the OpenAI-style transcript.

Sources

Multiples in brackets compare with Avencera’s cheapest offer at the same volume.

Monthly list prices for recorded audio with speaker labels, before free credit, discounts or contracts. Each plan uses whichever of its options costs least at that volume.

Accuracy: Lower is better, and results within 0.1 points count as level. pyannoteAI ran its diarization benchmark itself, without telling any system how many speakers to expect. Avencera’s speaker labels run community-1 through speakrs, which matches pyannote’s published error rates. Averages weight each recording type equally. Artificial Analysis tests Parakeet v3 as hosted by Together AI.

Vendor prices and features from each vendor’s own pages, checked October 23, 2026. Benchmark results as of October 23, 2026 for the Artificial Analysis speech-to-text and October 22, 2026 for the pyannoteAI diarization benchmark.